Exposing Any Business or Government We The People

Dan Price is the founder of Gravity Payments. The social justice warrior made national news some years back for giving all of his employees a raise too a $70,000 "minimum wage". Why is the social justice warrior refusing to stand up to his own corrupt bankcard trade group and lobby,  Electronic Transactions Association.

Are Voters Being Disenfranchised?

Yesterday Clip Artist Films reached out to Adrian Fontes, Maricopa County Recorder for comment on a tip that came in from a concerned citizen. The voter in question has been a registered Republican for 25 years. After sending in their ballot weeks ago, a form letter was received just this week informing them the affidavit was no good in spite of the fact the signature of the individual hadn’t changed. 

What’s more is the tipster also informed me that there were conflicting reports on social media concerning the validity of the rejection letters. It seems that there’s a coordinated effort to dissuade those who receive the rejection letter from following up. Many social media accounts post that the letter is as scam and to NOT follow up. Of course this seems rather suspicious. So I dug deeper into that. More on that issue in the news video later.

I then called the Public Information Officer for Mr. Fontes, Diana Solorio today for comment about the issue with the letters. Clip Artist Films was also curious as to how this entire process worked, the rejection of ballots for what’s perceived as bad signatures. Who makes the decision? How are the signature verifiers vetted for political affiliation. A HUGE can of worms opened up...

15 minutes into our call, Diana Solorio represented to me she could no longer hear the connection. When this “technical issue” happened on her phone, I was insisting that she give me an answer on something glaring to me. I had posed scenario where for example a senior citizen drops off their ballot on Election Day. This senior isn’t internet savvy and is our private with their phone number, so the only way to contact them would be by US Mail. And then after the ballot is submitted, one of the signature verifiers decides it’s not valid. I asked what happens to that vote? How much time does this voter have to reaffirm? She couldn’t give me an answer. Then like I said, the phone connection no longer worked on her end. I could hear just fine.  She asked for my email for official comment from The Recorders office to address my concern. 

After being more than 2 hours late for the comment deadline, Clip Artist Films finally received an email from her at 7:02 PM. Ironically the news story was supposed to air at 7PM, but I loaded everything in 4K, so the actual piece won’t be up on the news site until Friday night. I’m traveling and my upload speed is very slow. However, we finally have an official comment. “The early voting department issues by mail until Tuesday, October 27. A notification by mail is not sent after this date since it will arrive to the voter at this time. In addition, we reach out to voters with text, phone, and email through the ballot during curing period.” Diana Solorio, Public Information Officer for Adrian P. Fontes. 

What this means is that my hunch was right. If you’re a senior citizen that doesn’t engage with technology and keeps your phone number private... if your signature gets “rejected", you will be disenfranchised! No mail gets sent out after October 27th!

I might add Diana Solorio actually brought up this fact herself, that the scenario and demographic of citizens keeping their phone number private is in play. What’s more is that it’s likely that senior citizens in particular often times don’t engage in technology well to track anything online. Yes, there are many retirees in Maricopa County that rely on the good ole US Mail. How many senior citizens is this affecting? Statistics show the vast majority of them are Republicans! 

Of course this begs questions about the entire process. Because of Covid many will simply drop ballots on Election Day or have already mailed them in. If 2020 has taught us anything...it’s that all trends are out the window. The old “low” rejection stats always pointed to by Fontes are irrelevant this season in my view.

Also remember, our tipster didn’t get the letter for 2 weeks. So isn’t it plausible that we’ve already been in a window of disenfranchisement now for 7-10 days already? And not just the example I used with seniors. This can be any voter that doesn’t engage in technology well. And how reliable are these other supposed notification techniques? There was a suit filed in 2018 by the GOP concerning early voting issues like these.

How many votes won’t be counted? How many rejections will there really end up being that don’t get “cured”? According to Mr. Fontes, he is quoted as saying he expected 90% of the votes to be early ballots. His office always throws out the talking point of low rejection numbers from election seasons past, but as I said, we are in the middle of a pandemic! It’s plausible that we will later find out the number is much higher than in past election cycles. Furthermore, who’s behind the calculated campaign on social media to spread propaganda the letters are fake?

Why would Sheriff Paul Penzone fabricate internal affairs cases against his own deputies? 

Clip Artist Films has also spoken to multiple Maricopa County Sheriff's Office anonymous whistle blowers. The extremely reliable sources have confirmed that illegal political targeting of "non-loyal" deputies and employees, using bogus internal affairs cases as a weapon against them has been a specific and coordinated attack by Penzone himself. 

Recently in 2021, the embattled Sheriff Penzone has been under increased pressure to come clean with the backlog of I.A. cases. In a classic #SHERRIFCONMAN move, Penzone attempted to take control of the narrative by trying to distract the public with a bizarre press conference, professing to be the king of transparency, offering his unnecessary opinion on HB2765 . Only days later the lame attempt back fired in is face as protestors made their voices heard. Citizens expressing their First Amendment that day didn't even realize the real reason behind the cover up wasn't due to revealing police misconduct on the street level, rather in the administration of the Sheriff's office itself. The cover up continues.

Phoenix main stream media has neglected to report to the public at large that there's definitive evidence that Penzone is purposefully dragging his feet on the back log of I.A. cases, claiming MCSO lacks the manpower to complete al the investigations, when the most likely cause as catching up finality of cases would likely implicate Penzone in criminal activity.   

May 14th, 2019 an explosive article was published by Law Enforcement Today titled, "LET Exclusive – Is Maricopa County Controlled by George Soros? It was discovered that Soros had planted a personal mole in Penzone's first administration. From the article, "Let’s get back to Stephanie Fleischman Cherny. She was instrumental in the support of La Raza’s lawsuit and attack on then-Governor Jan Brewer and then-Sheriff Joe Arpaio in a case filed with the 9thCircuit Court. This reeks of conflict as she was lead counsel on the suit (see below), but then assisted in Penzone’s election and ultimate defeat of Joe Arpaio – when articles about Arpaio were used as a basis for the suit. She now enjoys a position on Penzone’s staff as his chief of staff and special counsel. When you put the pieces of the puzzle together or follow the trail of breadcrumbs, it’s easy to see how George Soros directly controls the daily operations of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, and how Paul Penzone is his puppet."